One way is to live modestly while working so there are more savings and less adjustment on retirement.
Recently, I took a break from work to attend a two-day workshop designed to equip older working professionals with the know-how to cope financially.
One exercise generated some surprising responses from course participants.
We were asked to work out how a 55-year old breadwinner could continue to support a homemaker wife, a son doing national service and a bedridden mother being looked after by a maid, if he loses his $7,000-a-month job.
To a hard-headed financial writer like myself, the first thing the breadwinner should do is to check if the investment strategy he uses to deploy his $700,000 CPF savings and cash can generate sufficient passive income to carry on with the lifestyle his family is used to.
But other responses were sometimes bizarre, such as the suggestion to bump off the ailing mother in order to send the maid home.
Others were hilarious, like the advice from one person who said the son should live permanently in the army barracks so his room could be rented out for extra income.
But the consensus was that the breadwinner and his wife should both try to get part-time jobs, as their $700,000 nest egg would be insufficient to last them through their golden years even though it seemed like a large sum.
There would also have to be painful adjustments to be made, such as getting rid of the family car and the maid – in short, giving up the lifestyle to which they had become accustomed.
Since this exercise relates to a typical Singaporean family, it is a chilling reminder of the fate which may befall us if we fail to do proper financial planning while still gainfully employed.
It is also a problem which may become more prevalent, since Singaporeans aged between 45 and 64 make up about 29.5 per cent of the resident population.
A report released last year by the Institute of Policy Studies, based on interviews with 5,000 senior citizens in 2011, sheds some light on the financial issues faced after retirement.
It noted that one in five respondents had no savings by the end of each month. For those aged 75 and older, the figure rose to an even more worrying 40 per cent. Among the respondents looking for a job after retiring, more than half said they needed money for current expenses.
In the light of this, it should come as no surprise that a financial adviser is likely to serve up a blunt message: Save your way to retirement – and try not to spend more than you earn.
Still, I don’t believe in trying to cut expenses to the bone and confining myself to a fixed budget every day just to reap some savings.
Such strictures make a person feel small and kill the spirit.
Our lives lie ahead for us to enjoy. It would be very miserable if we have to worry about how we spend our money all the time. That condemns us to a life of mediocrity and makes us unwilling to take any kind of risks.
Having said that, I have many friends who stopped working in their late 40s or early 50s and chose to live only on their savings and investments. They do not seem to be any worse off for it.
Source: The Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Limited. Reproduced with permission.
The views, material and information presented by any third party are strictly the views of such third party. Without prejudice to any third party content or materials whatsoever are provided for information purposes and convenience only. Council For The Third Age shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damage whatsoever arising directly or indirectly howsoever in connection with or as a result of any person accessing or acting on any information contained in such content or materials. The presentation of such information by third parties on this Council For The Third Age website does not imply and shall not be construed as any representation, warranty, endorsement or verification by Council For The Third Age in respect of such content or materials.